Supreme Court of India

Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Anr.

Published on this website · Updated

Civil Appeal No. 11950 of 2025

Citation: 2026 INSC 668

India | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 | Section 7India | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 | Section 14India | Advocates Act, 1961 | Sections 35 and 36

Case summary

The judgment in brief

In 2026 INSC 668, the Supreme Court of India set aside NCLT and NCLAT orders that relied on fake AI-generated precedents. Read the holding and critique.

Question of law

Whether NCLT and NCLAT orders that relied on nonexistent, wrongly cited, or falsely attributed precedents could remain legally valid, and what duties apply when AI-assisted legal research is used.

Court holding

What the Court decided

The Supreme Court held that reliance on fabricated or unverified authorities taints the adjudicatory process. AI may assist legal work, but advocates, judges, tribunals, and appellate bodies retain a mandatory human duty to verify every cited authority from an authentic source.

Result

Outcome and directions

The NCLT and NCLAT orders were set aside. The section 7 IBC application was restored to the NCLT for a fresh merits decision, preferably within two weeks, with status quo to continue meanwhile. The Court expressed no opinion on the underlying insolvency merits.

Practical effect

What the decision means in practice

The NCLT and NCLAT orders were set aside. The section 7 IBC application was restored to the NCLT for a fresh merits decision, preferably within two weeks, with status quo to continue meanwhile. The Court expressed no opinion on the underlying insolvency merits.

This summary states the immediate effect recorded in the decision. The original judgment and the facts of the particular case remain controlling.

New judgment alerts

Follow this court or legal topic

Receive new judgments and analysis about Supreme Court of India, Civil Law by email.

Primary source

Original judgment and official source

This HTML summary does not replace the court record. Use the linked original judgment PDF or official court source to verify the exact text and directions.

Precedent record

Authority and later treatment

Publication
Citation recorded: 2026 INSC 668
Primary source
Primary judgment PDF held in the journal library
Later treatment
No later judicial treatment has yet been editorially verified for this record

Treatment labels are added only after the later judgment has been checked; absence of a label is not a statement that no later authority exists.

Research tools

Use this judgment in your research

Compare judgments

Judgment text is provided for legal research and general information. Verify the official court record before relying on it in proceedings.