Criminal Law · Legal issue collection

Further Inquiry in Bail in Pakistan

Find Pakistani bail decisions discussing disputed evidence, the alleged obligation and the need for further inquiry. The linked cases cover different offences and procedural settings; their facts and relief should be read separately.

Showing 1–3 of 3 · Page 1 of 1

Research starting points

Start with these decisions

Selected from the linked collection. Read the full judgment, facts and procedural context before relying on a proposition.

Supreme Court of Pakistan · News Analysis

FIA Visa Fraud Bail: Supreme Court on Digital Evidence, Further Inquiry and Consistency

Syed Muhammad Ashfaq v The State through Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan · Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 100-K of 2026 · Judgment dated 24 September 2026; approved for reporting; reporter citation not stated in supplied copy

The Supreme Court granted bail in an FIA visa-document case on further inquiry, co-accused consistency and non-prohibitory offences, leaving digital evidence for trial.

Supreme Court of Pakistan, Appellate Jurisdiction · News Analysis

Supreme Court: Section 489-F Cannot Be Used to Recover Disputed Business Debt Through Security Cheques

Farman Ali Khan v The State and another · Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1448 of 2026 · Approved for reporting; reported citation not stated in the supplied order

The Supreme Court confirmed pre-arrest bail where the cheque amount materially exceeded the liability found in investigation, supporting the defence that the cheques secured ongoing business dealings rather than a fixed debt.

Continue your research

More relevant judgments and articles

Lahore High Court, Multan Bench (Judicial Department) (Pakistan) · News Analysis

LHC: Driving a Bus Without a PSV Licence Can Attract Section 322 PPC

Riaz Hussain v. The State and another · Criminal Miscellaneous No. 5377-B of 2026 · 2026 LHC 5349; approved for reporting

In 2026 LHC 5349, the Lahore High Court treated driving a bus without the required PSV entitlement as an unlawful act and refused post-arrest bail under section 322 PPC.