Service Law · Legal issue collection
Pension and Retirement Benefits in Pakistan
Find Pakistani pension and retirement disputes covering contract service, incomplete disciplinary proceedings, resignation and the proper forum. Check the employment history and the operative order in each record.
Showing 1–5 of 5 · Page 1 of 1
Research starting points
Start with these decisions
Selected from the linked collection. Read the full judgment, facts and procedural context before relying on a proposition.
PTCL Pension: FCC Orders Bheru Lal’s Dues After Disciplinary Proceedings Abate
Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. v. Bheru Lal and another · F.C.P.L.A. No. 781 of 2026 · Heard 9 September 2026; announced 14 October 2026. Approved for reporting; reporter citation not printed.
FCC orders PTCL to pay Bheru Lal’s pension and back benefits after an unfinished inquiry abated at retirement, enforcing protected service terms and court deadlines.
Muhammad Akram v. National Bank of Pakistan: Pension Rights, Finality and Time-Barred Review
Muhammad Akram v. National Bank of Pakistan and others · C.P.L.A. No. 2793-L of 2022 · Approved for reporting; reported citation not yet assigned
The Federal Constitutional Court held that pension benefits are vested and enforceable, rejected an attempt to bypass limitation through Article 199, and restored finality to a 2008 reinstatement order.
Continue your research
More relevant judgments and articles
Punjab Pension Claim Must Follow Service Tribunal Route: FCC Chamber Order
Dr. Saghir Alam and others v Registrar, Federal Constitutional Court, Islamabad · Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 36/2026 (first page and FCC cause list; later page headers say 34/2026) · Chamber order dated 29 September 2026; approved for reporting; reporter citation not stated in supplied copy
The Federal Constitutional Court upheld office objections to a direct constitutional pension petition, holding that retired Punjab employees must pursue the applicable service law remedies. It did not decide their pension entitlement.
Invalid Resignation Is Not Retirement: Supreme Court
Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Secretary Population Welfare Department and others v. Mst. Bacha Jehan · Civil Petition No. 50-P of 2022 · Approved for reporting; reported citation not stated in the supplied judgment
In Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa v. Mst. Bacha Jehan, the Supreme Court held that a service tribunal may invalidate an unproved resignation but cannot convert it into retirement merely because the employee completed pensionable service.
Najma Parveen Case: Contract Service Counts for Pension, Not Seniority
The Secretary, Schools Education Department, Government of the Punjab, Lahore and another v. Mst. Najma Parveen and connected respondents · Civil Petitions Nos. 2354-L to 2370-L, 2403-L, 2404-L and 2405-L of 2025 · Approved for reporting; reported citation not yet assigned
The Supreme Court held that uninterrupted contract service followed by regularization counts for pension, but not seniority, backdated status or increments.