Supreme Court of Pakistan
Aurangzaib Alamgir v. Muhammad Sajid and others
Criminal Petition No. 58-K of 2023
Citation: 2024 SCP 419; PLD 2025 SC 53
Case summary
The judgment in brief
In Aurangzaib Alamgir v. Muhammad Sajid, the Supreme Court held that cognizance alone does not justify dismissing a Section 561-A CrPC petition without examining whether the record discloses abuse of process.
Question of law
The legal question
Whether the High Court could summarily dismiss a Section 561-A CrPC petition solely because the trial court had taken cognizance, without considering whether the petition disclosed a prima facie abuse of process or another need to secure the ends of justice.
Holding
What the Court decided
No. Cognizance alone was neither a lawful nor persuasive reason to dismiss the petition without addressing its grounds. Section 561-A is curative and exceptional, not a substitute for Sections 249-A or 265-K, but the High Court must consider whether an apparent abuse of process or other exceptional circumstance is shown.
Result
Outcome and directions
The Criminal Petition was converted into an appeal and allowed. The High Court's summary dismissal was set aside and Crl. Misc. Application No. 94 of 2022 was remanded for a fresh decision after notice to the parties. The Supreme Court did not quash the complaint or decide its merits.
Precedent record
Authority and later treatment
- Publication
- Citation recorded: 2024 SCP 419; PLD 2025 SC 53
- Primary source
- Primary judgment PDF held in the journal library
- Later treatment
- No later judicial treatment has yet been editorially verified for this record
Treatment labels are added only after the later judgment has been checked; absence of a label is not a statement that no later authority exists.
Research tools
Use this judgment in your research
Copy a link to a specific part
Judgment text is provided for legal research and general information. Verify the official court record before relying on it in proceedings.
Independent analysis
Read Shahbaz Shah's legal commentary
In Aurangzaib Alamgir v. Muhammad Sajid, the Supreme Court held that cognizance alone does not justify dismissing a Section 561-A CrPC petition without examining whether the record discloses abuse of process.
Read full commentary →