Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur

Sheetalkumar Sudhakar Manere v. State of Maharashtra and Sanjay Danchand Ghodawat

Published on this website

Criminal Writ Petition No. 4617 of 2025

Citation: Neutral or reporter citation not stated in the judgment

India | Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 | Section 173(8)India | Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 | Section 156(3)India | Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 | Section 397India | Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 | Section 482India | Constitution of India | Article 21

Background

Background

Bombay High Court upholds further investigation under section 173(8) CrPC before charges, recognising the complainant’s standing and rejecting a proposed accused’s hearing claim.

Legal questions

Whether a complainant may seek further investigation after cognizance and before framing of charges, and whether a proposed accused must be heard on that application.

Court holding

What the Court decided

The complainant had standing to request further investigation; the Magistrate retained power after cognizance at the pre-charge stage. The proposed accused had no automatic hearing right or locus to intervene in the application on these facts. The Magistrate’s reasoned order disclosed no illegality or perversity.

Final outcome

Final outcome

Criminal writ petition dismissed; rule discharged; no costs. The 23 July 2025 order allowing further investigation under section 173(8) remained intact. No finding of guilt was made against the petitioner.

Practical effect

What the decision means in practice

Criminal writ petition dismissed; rule discharged; no costs. The 23 July 2025 order allowing further investigation under section 173(8) remained intact. No finding of guilt was made against the petitioner.

This summary states the immediate effect recorded in the decision. The original judgment and the facts of the particular case remain controlling.

New judgment alerts

Follow this court or legal topic

Receive new judgments and analysis about Criminal Law by email.

Primary source

Original judgment and official source

This HTML summary does not replace the court record. Use the linked original judgment PDF or official court source to verify the exact text and directions.

Later treatment

Later treatment

Research tools

Use this judgment in your research

Compare judgments

Judgment text is provided for legal research and general information. Verify the official court record before relying on it in proceedings.