Supreme Court of India
Rajasthan Housing Board v. M/s Hariyali Rural Ventures Ltd. and others
Published on this website
Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 35141/2026
Citation: 2026 INSC 1168
Background
Background
In Rajasthan Housing Board, the Supreme Court rejects delay beyond 120 days under section 74, disputes S.V. Global and leaves pending appeals to High Courts.
Legal questions
Legal questions
Can section 5 of the Limitation Act extend the further 60-day period under section 74, and did the Housing Board’s Article 227 challenge warrant interference?
Court holding
What the Court decided
The bench treated 60 days plus a conditional further 60 days as an inflexible outer limit, disagreed with S.V. Global Mill, and declined a larger-bench reference in reliance on larger-bench precedent. Independently, the Board had pursued Article 227 rather than filing a delayed section 74 appeal; even assuming the earlier decision was correct, its ratio did not assist the Board.
Final outcome
Final outcome
Special leave petition dismissed; connected applications disposed of; larger-bench reference declined. Paragraph 24 leaves pending time-barred section 74 appeals to the relevant High Courts for decision in accordance with law.
Practical effect
What the decision means in practice
Special leave petition dismissed; connected applications disposed of; larger-bench reference declined. Paragraph 24 leaves pending time-barred section 74 appeals to the relevant High Courts for decision in accordance with law.
This summary states the immediate effect recorded in the decision. The original judgment and the facts of the particular case remain controlling.
Key legal principles
Key legal principles
- The bench treated 60 days plus a conditional further 60 days as an inflexible outer limit, disagreed with S.V. Global Mill, and declined a larger-bench reference in reliance on larger-bench precedent. Independently, the Board had pursued Article 227 rather than filing a delayed section 74 appeal; even assuming the earlier decision was correct, its ratio did not assist the Board.
- The further 60-day filing period requires sufficient cause; 120 days is not an unconditional appeal period.
- Pending time-barred appeals were left for High Courts to decide in accordance with law.
New judgment alerts
Follow this court or legal topic
Receive new judgments and analysis about Supreme Court of India, Civil Law by email.
Primary source
Original judgment and official source
This HTML summary does not replace the court record. Use the linked original judgment PDF or official court source to verify the exact text and directions.
Later treatment
Later treatment
Research tools
Use this judgment in your research
Copy a link to a specific part
Judgment text is provided for legal research and general information. Verify the official court record before relying on it in proceedings.
Related article
Related article
In Rajasthan Housing Board, the Supreme Court rejects delay beyond 120 days under section 74, disputes S.V. Global and leaves pending appeals to High Courts.
Read the related article →