Supreme Court of Pakistan

The Commissioner Inland Revenue v M/s MCB Bank Ltd.

Published on this website · Updated

Civil Appeal No. 1468 of 2018

Citation: Judgment dated 8 July 2026; reporter citation not stated

Pakistan | Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Section 32Pakistan | Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Section 100APakistan | Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Sixth Schedule, Part II, Rule 4Pakistan | Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Seventh Schedule, Rule 9

Case summary

The judgment in brief

The Supreme Court held that an IAS-19 pension-fund surplus recorded in MCB Bank's accounts is taxable only when actually repaid to the employer.

Question of law

Can an IAS-19 actuarial surplus in an approved bank pension fund be taxed before actual repayment to the employer under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001?

Court holding

What the Court decided

Rule 4 of Part II of the Sixth Schedule requires actual repayment to the employer before the relevant approved pension-fund surplus is deemed taxable income. Rule 9 of the Seventh Schedule applies that specific rule to banks where the banking rules are silent.

Result

Outcome and directions

Revenue's appeal dismissed; Lahore High Court judgment in favour of MCB Bank upheld. First leave question answered in the negative, second in the affirmative.

Practical effect

What the decision means in practice

Revenue's appeal dismissed; Lahore High Court judgment in favour of MCB Bank upheld. First leave question answered in the negative, second in the affirmative.

This summary states the immediate effect recorded in the decision. The original judgment and the facts of the particular case remain controlling.

New judgment alerts

Follow this court or legal topic

Receive new judgments and analysis about Supreme Court of Pakistan, Commercial Law by email.

Primary source

Original judgment and official source

This HTML summary does not replace the court record. Use the linked original judgment PDF or official court source to verify the exact text and directions.

Precedent record

Authority and later treatment

Publication
Citation recorded: Judgment dated 8 July 2026; reporter citation not stated
Primary source
Primary judgment PDF held in the journal library
Later treatment
No later judicial treatment has yet been editorially verified for this record

Treatment labels are added only after the later judgment has been checked; absence of a label is not a statement that no later authority exists.

Research tools

Use this judgment in your research

Compare judgments

Judgment text is provided for legal research and general information. Verify the official court record before relying on it in proceedings.