Supreme Court of Pakistan
Khurram Rasheed v Ch. Haider Zaman and others
Published on this website
C.P.L.A. No. 4211/2023 (converted into appeal)
Citation: Judgment dated 26 March 2026; approved for reporting; no reporter citation stated in supplied copy
Case summary
The judgment in brief
In Khurram Rasheed v Ch. Haider Zaman, the Supreme Court restored a trial court decree after finding that allegations of fraud and forgery in a registered house sale were not proved.
Question of law
The legal question
Who bears the initial burden of proving fraud, forgery or misrepresentation when seeking cancellation of a registered sale deed?
Court holding
What the Court decided
The party alleging fraud must prove it with clear, convincing evidence; unsupported assertions and a mere denial of execution do not shift the initial burden to the deed's beneficiary.
Result
Outcome and directions
Petition converted into appeal and allowed; appellate and High Court judgments set aside; trial court's dismissal of the suit restored.
Practical effect
What the decision means in practice
Petition converted into appeal and allowed; appellate and High Court judgments set aside; trial court's dismissal of the suit restored.
This summary states the immediate effect recorded in the decision. The original judgment and the facts of the particular case remain controlling.
New judgment alerts
Follow this court or legal topic
Receive new judgments and analysis about Supreme Court of Pakistan, Civil Law, Evidence by email.
Primary source
Original judgment and official source
This HTML summary does not replace the court record. Use the linked original judgment PDF or official court source to verify the exact text and directions.
Precedent record
Authority and later treatment
- Publication
- Approved for reporting; reported citation should be checked when assigned
- Primary source
- Primary judgment PDF held in the journal library
- Later treatment
- No later judicial treatment has yet been editorially verified for this record
Treatment labels are added only after the later judgment has been checked; absence of a label is not a statement that no later authority exists.
Research tools
Use this judgment in your research
Copy a link to a specific part
Judgment text is provided for legal research and general information. Verify the official court record before relying on it in proceedings.
Independent analysis
Read Shahbaz Shah's legal commentary
In Khurram Rasheed v Ch. Haider Zaman, the Supreme Court restored a trial court decree after finding that allegations of fraud and forgery in a registered house sale were not proved.
Read full commentary →