Federal Constitutional Court of Pakistan

Tanveer Ahmed Tahir v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Establishment Division & others

Published on this website

C.P.L.A. No. 824 of 2022

Citation: Approved for reporting; no reporter or neutral citation printed in the supplied judgment

Pakistan | Civil Servants Promotion (BPS-18 to BPS-21) Rules, 2019 | Rules 6, 7 and 8Pakistan | Civil Servants Promotion (BPS-18 to BPS-21) Rules, 2019 | Rule 10Pakistan | Civil Servants Promotion (BPS-18 to BPS-21) Rules, 2019 | Rules 16 and 18Pakistan | Civil Servants Act, 1973 | Section 9(2)

Background

Background

FCC dismissed Tanveer Ahmed Tahir’s promotion petition, while requiring lawful reasons for repeated deferment and fresh consideration when the sole obstacle ends.

Legal questions

Whether repeated promotion deferment gives an automatic right to promotion, and what limits govern the CSB’s discretion and judicial review.

Court holding

What the Court decided

Three deferments do not create an automatic right to promotion. Each must have a lawful, relevant and adequately reasoned basis. When the sole obstacle ends, lawful reconsideration is required. Courts may examine the decision-making process without reassessing comparative merit or substituting for the CSB.

Final outcome

Final outcome

Leave to appeal refused and petition dismissed. The Islamabad High Court judgment remained undisturbed; no promotion or fresh CSB assessment was ordered.

Practical effect

What the decision means in practice

Challenge a specific illegality, irrelevant consideration or unsupported deferment; the number of prior deferments alone does not establish an entitlement to promotion.

This summary states the immediate effect recorded in the decision. The original judgment and the facts of the particular case remain controlling.

New judgment alerts

Follow this court or legal topic

Receive new judgments and analysis about Federal Constitutional Court of Pakistan, Service Law by email.

Primary source

Original judgment and official source

This HTML summary does not replace the court record. Use the linked original judgment PDF or official court source to verify the exact text and directions.

Later treatment

Later treatment

Research tools

Use this judgment in your research

Compare judgments

Judgment text is provided for legal research and general information. Verify the official court record before relying on it in proceedings.