Federal Constitutional Court of Pakistan

Chairperson TEVTA v. Shahid Saleem and others

Published on this website

C.P.L.A. 1333/2025

Citation: Citation not provided

Pakistan | Punjab Employees Efficiency, Discipline and Accountability Act, 2006 | Sections 10, 11, 12 and 13(6)Pakistan | Punjab Employees Efficiency, Discipline and Accountability Act, 2006 | Sections 4(1)(b)(ii), 4(1)(b)(v) and 16(2)(d)

Background

Background

In TEVTA v. Shahid Saleem, the FCC set aside a High Court ceiling on punishment after a fresh inquiry, stressing the evidence, reasons and opportunity of defence.

Legal questions

Fresh PEEDA Inquiry Can Support a Harsher Penalty on New Facts or Evidence: FCC

Court holding

What the Court decided

The competent authority is not bound by an earlier penalty where new facts or evidence supporting a different conclusion emerge in a lawful de novo inquiry. A major penalty requires proper inquiry and full opportunity of defence.

Final outcome

Final outcome

Petition converted into an appeal and allowed; Lahore High Court judgment of 13 March 2025 set aside.

Practical effect

What the decision means in practice

Petition converted into an appeal and allowed; Lahore High Court judgment of 13 March 2025 set aside.

This summary states the immediate effect recorded in the decision. The original judgment and the facts of the particular case remain controlling.

New judgment alerts

Follow this court or legal topic

Receive new judgments and analysis about Federal Constitutional Court of Pakistan, Service Law by email.

Primary source

Original judgment and official source

This HTML summary does not replace the court record. Use the linked original judgment PDF or official court source to verify the exact text and directions.

Later treatment

Later treatment

Research tools

Use this judgment in your research

Compare judgments

Judgment text is provided for legal research and general information. Verify the official court record before relying on it in proceedings.