Service Law · Legal issue collection
Departmental Inquiry and Back Benefits in Pakistan
Research disciplinary charges, proof, reinstatement and back benefits using the existing case analysis. Compare the findings, procedural defects and operative relief instead of assuming every reinstatement has the same consequences.
Showing 1–5 of 5 · Page 1 of 1
Research starting points
Start with these decisions
Selected from the linked collection. Read the full judgment, facts and procedural context before relying on a proposition.
Departmental Inquiries: Employees Cannot Be Punished on Uncharged Allegations and Reinstatement Carries Back Benefits
Muhammad Zulfiqar Abbasi and Israr Khan v Director General, Peshawar Development Authority and others · C.P.L.A. Nos. 2501 and 500-P of 2024 · Approved for reporting; reported citation not stated in the supplied judgment
The Federal Constitutional Court held that materially enlarged allegations and denial of cross-examination vitiated disciplinary proceedings, and ordered reinstatement with salary arrears and back benefits under constructive continuity.
Defective Departmental Inquiry: Supreme Court Orders Full Exoneration and Back Benefits
Nazir Ahmad v. Chief Secretary to Government of the Punjab, Lahore and another · Civil Petition No. 2732 of 2023 · Approved for reporting; reported citation not stated in the supplied judgment
The Supreme Court fully exonerated Nazir Ahmad and granted back pay from 1 August 2017 after accepting the core due-process and evidentiary objections advanced by Aftab Alam Yasir, Advocate Supreme Court.
Continue your research
More relevant judgments and articles
Punjab University Back Benefits: FCC Upholds Gulfam Nasir’s Claim After Exoneration
University of Punjab and others v. Gulfam Nasir and another · F.C.P.L.A. No. 464 of 2026 · Not approved for reporting; no reporter citation printed
FCC upholds Gulfam Nasir’s back benefits after exoneration and rejects Punjab University’s petition on merits and limitation.
LHC Rules on Back Benefits After Reinstatement
Baber Masih v. Cantonment Executive Officer, Sargodha and another · Writ Petition No. 17945 of 2025 · 2026 LHC 5569; approved for reporting
In 2026 LHC 5569, the Lahore High Court set aside an unreasoned denial of back benefits after reinstatement and ordered a fresh decision within two months.
Ellahi Bakhsh Bugti v. Government of Balochistan: Forensic Proof in Departmental Inquiries
Ellahi Bakhsh Bugti and Behram Khan v. Government of Balochistan through Chief Secretary, Quetta and others · Civil Petitions Nos. 4364 and 4391 of 2024 · Approved for reporting; reported citation not yet assigned
The Supreme Court set aside a Service Tribunal judgment because disciplinary guilt rested on unresolved and contradictory evidence, and ordered a three-month de novo inquiry with forensic examination.