Supreme Court of Pakistan
Habib Ullah v The State
Published on this website
Jail Petition No. 41 of 2023
Citation: Approved for reporting; neutral citation not stated in the supplied judgment
Case summary
The judgment in brief
In Habib Ullah v State, the Supreme Court upheld a husband's conviction and explained Articles 122 and 129 QSO in a wife's domestic homicide.
Question of law
The legal question
Whether the proved circumstantial evidence, the petitioner's failure to explain facts especially within his knowledge, and his post-occurrence conduct completed the chain of guilt for his wife's murder inside their matrimonial home.
Court holding
What the Court decided
Yes. After the prosecution established the foundational circumstances, Article 122 required a plausible explanation of facts especially within the petitioner’s knowledge. The last-seen evidence, motive, medical compatibility, failure to report the crime and nearly seven years of abscondence formed a complete chain proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Result
Outcome and directions
Leave to appeal was refused and Jail Petition No. 41 of 2023 was dismissed. The conviction under section 302(b) PPC, life sentence and Rs 500,000 compensation under section 544-A CrPC therefore remained undisturbed.
Practical effect
What the decision means in practice
Leave to appeal was refused and Jail Petition No. 41 of 2023 was dismissed. The conviction under section 302(b) PPC, life sentence and Rs 500,000 compensation under section 544-A CrPC therefore remained undisturbed.
This summary states the immediate effect recorded in the decision. The original judgment and the facts of the particular case remain controlling.
New judgment alerts
Follow this court or legal topic
Receive new judgments and analysis about Supreme Court of Pakistan, Criminal Law, Evidence by email.
Primary source
Original judgment and official source
This HTML summary does not replace the court record. Use the linked original judgment PDF or official court source to verify the exact text and directions.
Precedent record
Authority and later treatment
- Publication
- Approved for reporting; reported citation should be checked when assigned
- Primary source
- Primary judgment PDF held in the journal library
- Later treatment
- No later judicial treatment has yet been editorially verified for this record
Treatment labels are added only after the later judgment has been checked; absence of a label is not a statement that no later authority exists.
Research tools
Use this judgment in your research
Copy a link to a specific part
Judgment text is provided for legal research and general information. Verify the official court record before relying on it in proceedings.
Independent analysis
Read Shahbaz Shah's legal commentary
In Habib Ullah v State, the Supreme Court upheld a husband's conviction and explained Articles 122 and 129 QSO in a wife's domestic homicide.
Read full commentary →